Monday, December 19, 2011

First Draft- Documenting the Processes.


Alison Stewart
December 19, 2011

Lets Take A Stroll

“Observe the street from time to time, with some concern of system perhaps. Apply yourself. Take your time… Note down what you can see. Anything worthy of not going on. Do you know how to see what’s worthy of note? Is there anything that strikes you? Nothing strikes you. You don’t know how to see. You must set about it more slowly, almost stupidly. Force yourself to write down what is of no interest, what is most obvious, most common, most colourless” (Perec 50).

I step out the sliding double doors and I walk.  Quick, directed steps lead me out into the brisk December air and my journey of the Brooklyn streets begins. It is a familiar journey that I have taken many, many times (often as much as four times a day) and I am not alone on this journey, but I am one of many. I am walking to the subway. The universal means of transportation that most every New Yorker takes, rich or poor, but however, today’s journey is no focused on the actual subway at all, today I am focus of the walk itself. Today I explore the sidewalks, the street lamps, the gates, the dogs on leashes. Today I explore the overlooked, unnoticed, and often disregarded treasures that the sidewalks of St. James Place and Dekalb have to offer.  Today I explore the graffiti, markings, the posters, and the stickers placed by hidden on the streets of Clinton Hill and through these markings I am able to map my journey. I explore the etchings on the sidewalk, the stickers behind the one-way sign, and the piled and layered posters of want ads and missing dog signs on the street light post. Through the graffiti I am able to map the chosen area by exploring art placed in areas and on objects that they were unintended for as well as observing the people, the places, and the things that make up our everyday lives in close detail.
In the essay, “Walking in the City,” by Michael De Certeau, De Certeau speaks about the importance of walking and “seeing” a city from the ground, rather than seen from above in a birds-eye-view so often seen in maps. “To be lifted to the summit of the World Trade Center is to be lifted out of the city’s grasp,” states De Certeau (157).  De Certeau believes that by viewing a city from above, the viewer can easily misunderstand what he or she is seeing and is not able to appreciate the location. De Certeau strongly argues the only way to understand an area is to walk it, and he explains that walking down below is the threshold at which visibility begins. (158). So, in order to fully appreciate and accurately map my location I have no other choice than to walk, and so my journey begins.
With De Certeau’s words in mind I put one foot in front of the other. I walk, I walk, and I walk. My pace at first is fast; so habituated to the quick steps I normally take, I must remind myself to slow down. I have no time schedule, no one I need to meet, and no place I need to be. I have time to observe, explore, and examine.  In James Corner’s essay, “The Agency of Mapping: Speculation, Critique and Invention” Corner writes about a concept of mapping called drifting in which an area is mapped by walking aimlessly, with no particular path or stopping point and this idea concept  much so applies to my technique as well. Drifting forms a “more cognitive mapping than mimetic description of the cityscape,” states Corner (231). By walking aimlessly the walkers’ map beings to reflects subjective, personal experiences rather than just purely factual. To walk and to explore with no sense of time and direction allows to walker to experience their walk and take in a new understanding of the journey.  Things such as cracks in the sidewalks become craters. Puddles of rainwater in the road become ponds, and parks become forests in the mind of the walker. The everyday now becomes the terrain. Every terrain becomes projected on a larger scale


Graffiti is everywhere. Black marker, white marker, yellow maker—graffiti artists use them all. Small stickers, large stickers, colorful and dark ones can be seen on the sides of trashcans and the backs of street signs. Etchings in the concrete and paint on the brick all contribute to the graffiti artwork in Clinton Hill.  Why did these artists leave these marks, I wonder? What message are they trying to bare? Is there a certain meaning behind these images?
graffiti 9.jpg
As I walk, not only do I notice the graffiti, but I also notice the people around me as we. As Perec states in the essay, “The Street” in Species of Spaces and other Pieces, “The people in the streets: where are they coming from? Where are they going? Who are they?” I must observe everything and everyone in order to truly map in detail. As I walk slowly, the others walk quickly and hurriedly. As I talk time to notice the small writing in the corner of the gate, others only notice their cell phones and watches. I judge them as they walk speedily walk away from me thinking “Why are you in such a hurry?” when I have to remind myself that I am normally one of those people on any other day of the week. slowly walk, the other walkers quickly step around me. It seems as though because I am not walking quickly enough, I am in their way, like a brick wall in the middle of the sidewalk. In one incidence I stop walking to take a picture of graffiti I saw marked on a private fence and someone yells at me, “You can’t just stand in the middle of the sidewalk like that!” as the walk around me. On this walk I have learned about more than just graffiti, I have learned about the people that occupy the streets as well.  So caught up are they in their lives and routines that even something as innocent as stopping in the sidewalk  becomes and inconvenience to them,
As I walk, the concept of drifting comes to mind, explained in James Corner’s essay, “The Agency of Mapping; Speculation, Critique and Invention.” Corner, as well as De Certeau, comments on the importance of walking in mapping a cit yTo Corner, walking is one of the most important activities involved in mapping and in order to fully take in a city one must walk.  So this is what I am doing, I am walking and documenting. Drifting is a way of mapping that Corner writes about and although I know where I am going, the method of drifting applies directly to the way I am mapping my journey. “They were less interested in art objects and stylistic concerns than with the engaging life situations and social formations.” Through walking aimlessly the walkers’ map reflects subjective, personal experiences rather than just purely factual.  To walk and to explore with no sense of time and direction allows to walker to experience their walk and take in a new understanding of the journey.  Things such as cracks in the sidewalks become craters. Puddles of rainwater in the road become ponds, and parks become forests in the mind of the walker. Every terrain becomes projected on what they seeing front of time because this is their everyday life.
As do most people, my normal walk to the subway is often rushed, quick, and direct. Whether it is I’m running late for work or I simply want to get out of the cold, my walk to the subway is not often leisurely. Although quick walking is good exercise, it does not, however, allow much time for me to take notice of the art around me and by art I mean graffiti, markings, stickers, and signs left by one person for another to see in an area unintended for such purposes.
Often times when one walks in New York City, one is walking with a purpose. Especially as the weather begins to turn colder it is even less common to see anyone taking a leisurely stroll, perhaps hand in hand with his or her child or spouse, or by themselves just enjoying the day. With the bustle and everyday grind of life it is easy for people to get preoccupied in their own problems.  In my journey I am doing  he opposite of what most  of the travelers around me are doing. I am taking a stroll. I am walking without a pressing purpose and I am walking slowly.  Graffiti is everywhere. No, not blatantly so as in the subway train from the 1980’s seen in “Style Wars,” but at the bottom of street light posts and the back of signs.  It is drawn on the corner of the fire hydrant and seen on the bottom of the trash can.
As I slowly walk, the other walkers quickly step around me. It seems as though because I am not walking quickly enough, I am in their way, like a brick wall in the middle of the sidewalk. In one incidence I stop walking to take a picture of graffiti I saw marked on a private fence and someone yells at me, “You can’t just stand in the middle of the sidewalk like that!” as the walk around me. On this walk I have learned about more than just graffiti, I have learned about the people that occupy the streets as well.  So caught up are they in their lives and routines that even something as innocent as stopping in the sidewalk  becomes and inconvenience to them,

Graffiti by definition is writing or drawings scribbled, scratched, or sprayed illicitly on a wall of other surface in a public place.  To some graffiti is art; to others it is vandalism. To some it enhances a neighborhood with character and liveliness; to others it is an eye sore.  To some it exemplifies an urban and thriving culture; to others it is a never-ending plague. In the documentary “Style Wars” that debuted in 1983 and directed by Tony Silver, Silver documents the effect that graffiti and graffiti artists have on the community. “I’ll show you graffiti… Is that an art form?” states Detective Bernie Jenkins who is the crime prevention coordinator for the New York City transit police department, “I don’t know but I sure as hell can tell you that’s a crime.”
However one thinks of graffiti, whether fondly or not, one cannot deny that it is everywhere. Sure because of modern technology and laws, graffiti such as “train bombing” which is seen in Style Wars, is no longer around but artists still find ways to leave their mark regardless. I run into my first graffiti quickly after walking out my door. On the back of a sign screwed into the gate at 215 Willoughby, I see several stickers piled up on top of each other.  The top one states “PTOSIS.”  I quickly move down the street, heading west on Willoughby and I run into my second encounter with graffiti. The U.S. postal service mailbox has been tagged in red and silver paint.
                           graffiti image 4.jpg
The graffiti that I find is miniscule, small at most. Gone are the days of radical art pieces seen on subway trains and city walls. All that is left are small markings seen on parking signs and fire hydrants here in Clinton Hill, but they remain nonetheless. Graffiti has been around for ages, dating back to prehistoric times in the form of historic cave paintings and still to this day they live. Although there are many graffiti pieces in Brooklyn, lots of which are commissioned, in my walk I only encounter the small and minor, drawn in the corner or down low as not to be seen.


     you dont see me.jpg
Graffiti Walk 2.jpg

graffiti image 5.jpg

Sunday, December 11, 2011

Lets Take A Stroll

                                    Street Post seem to be an easy target for graffiti and signs.


Leaving initials in cement marks your name forever.
"BANG BANG"


If you look closely you can often times find the most interesting things.

Wednesday, December 7, 2011

Key Words of "Walking in the City"

1) voyeur
2) walker
3)concept city
4) urban pratices
5) migrationL, metaphorical
6) style
7) rhetorics of walking
8) fiction of knowledge
9) waste products
10) optical knowledge
11) legibility
12) spatialized
13) threshold
14) accepted framework
15) imposed order


The walker is " writing the city" without reading it. It is a poem "signed by many others" that cannot be legible.

The walker maps thru the body, they explores the thresholds not visible thru a birds-eye view.

Monday, December 5, 2011

Free Write- Style Wars

Graffiti maps the city through an artists point of view. The main image if grafitti are words, normally names that artists wish to be recognized and remembered. Colors and graphs are a big part of graffiti but more often than not, it is not the most important part. Graffiti relays a message. A message from the artists so it's viewers and a message from the artists to other artists.

Grafiti maps the young generation, he "hip-hop generation" and the ideas of these people. Grafitti maps the routes of the subway trains through the city. Graffiti can start in one place and be carried though a plethora of places. If nothing else it is remembered through

Graffiti makes in some cases social issues visible. It is not always just about the artwork or the colors but it is about the messGe the art is trying to portray.

By painting graffiti on the subway trains it is so much more visible to a wider audience. This way the artists work is seen everyday by hundreds if not thousands of people.

Writing IN the city. It becomes the city, it is part of the city. It no longer just affects the artists, it now effects EVERYBODY'S everyday.

A way for Marginalized groups express themsleves. A way to make these minority groups visible in a city where they are often made to feel invisible.

Graffiti makes a place become theirs. They make their mark, they make it their own.

Proposal


Territory/ Text
            - I will be analyzing and mapping the walk from my dorm room to the subway by exploring different "artists marks", or graffiti, posters, and signs. I will explore mapping by examining art that is created in a place it is not necessarily intended for, such as missing dog signs and graffiti. I will use the movie “Style War’s” as my primary text as well as “The Cruise” and “The Agency of Mapping.”

Specific Aspects of the Everyday that I will be Mapping

            - I will be mapping graffiti and urban artwork that can be seen, but commonly overlooked, on my walk to the subway. I will take pictures and video to try to grasp a deeper understanding of the message the artist was trying to portray through his or her artwork.

Concepts of Corner
1) Drifitngexplore different routes I can take to get to subway. What is the different graffiti I see going each way?
2) Extracting- the “de-territorialization” of my surroundings. The extraction of architecture, landscape, people.
3) Landscape and architectural arts- explore what the graffiti is drawn on.  Is there more graffiti is certain areas than others? Is it drawn on certain
4) Plotting- to track, to trace, to explore.

Critical Questions

1) How does the appearance of graffiti and signs affect my walk?
2) How does it interact with the body, the eyes, the senses?
3) How has technology affected the appearance and creation of graffiti?
4) How does this graffiti affect my everyday life, the walk I take everyday to get to the subway?

Format
My essay will be mapped using photographs and written text and possible video.

Research
“Style Wars” and “The Cruise” will be used in my research greatly. Research of the neighborhoods of Brooklyn, the subway, and the laws surrounding graffiti would also be helpful in my paper.

Style War Notes

Graffiti is thought to ruin the "quality of life"
- what then is the definition of quality?
- who's life does it ruin?

Is graffiti art? Or is it just a crime?

Grafitti is is the written work of the "hip-hop" culture. Break dancing is the movement, and rap is the music.

What is the rewason for graffiti?
- the artist want to immortalize himself. This way his name can live forever. It will be seen everywhere, all over the city.

The grafitti "bombing" is a very organized process. Sketches, meetings, and teamwork all play a big part. Graffiti is an idea of style and all the artists are competing for the best style. They want to be the most recognized, the most respected.

Monday, November 28, 2011

Yep, That’s a Monument


What is thought of when one hears the word monument? Is it grand, large, importance, sculpture? By definition monument is a noun that means a statue, building, or other structure erected to commemorate a famous or notable person or event. However in Smithson’s article, “The Monuments of Passaic,” published in Art Forum in 1967, he explores types of monuments that are rather unexpected. Construction sights, rusty bridges, and parking lots are now places of importance, standing monuments in the city of Passaic, New Jersey. By placing importance on these overlooked and deserted places, Smithson makes the viewer question what exactly is a monument while mapping and recording urban spaces and sites that are so often ignored by the masses, yet are so important to the makeup of a city and urban space. These deserted places better depict the everyday life and history of humans than any monument could.
As you begin reading the article, the story recalls a bus trip that Smithson took to Passaic, New Jersey in which he photographed desolate places and locations.  “The bus passed over the first monument. I pulled the buzzer-cord and got off at the corner of Union Avenue and River Drive” (70). These unassuming places, normally ruins of some type of architecture, are now regarded in glory as Smithson photographs the sites calling them monuments that “define the memory traces of an abandoned set of futures” (72). Nothing goes unnoticed with Smithson—used car lots become “new territory”, old sandboxes become “model deserts,” and idle machines become “mechanical dinosaurs stripped of their skin.” Smithson is trying to accurately record what, in this mind, should be considered monuments, what should be admired by the masses and revered as phenomenal.
 But why? Why would Smithson go through the trouble of photographing a rusty sign, concrete abutments, and old pipes? How are these structures even important, yet alone worthy of being called monuments? To answer this question perhaps we should look at another definition of the word monument in which it means, “ any building, megalith, etc., surviving from a past age, and regarded as of historical or archaeological importance.Smithson is taking this definition literally by addressing any building, megalith, etc. as monumental. By calling these sites monuments, Smithson makes the viewer question his or her definition of a monument. Why is this place memorable? What makes a monument important and what we should actually be regarding as important enough to be considered a monument? In the eyes of Smithson, these sites tell more about our future and past than do most traditional monuments in which one person or place is idolized. The past and the future cannot accurately be judged and discovered by remember the acts of just one person. The past and future can only be discovered and explored by remember how the everyday and how people lived and live their everyday life. Everyday life is about rusty pipes, abandoned lots, and old bridges. These objects reveal the everyday more than anything else because they reveal
 By recoding these forgotten places in the city of Passaic, New Jersey, Smithson tries to question the definition of a monument. Why shouldn’t the abandoned lot and old construction ruins not be considered just as important as the Gateway Arch or Washington Monument? Things happened in the places as well, did they not? Through his art, Smithson is trying to draw attention to the everyday forgotten places that make up the country of the United States. They are everywhere, in county, city, and state yet no one seems to deem them important enough to give them a second look. Well in “A Tour of the Monuments of Passaic, New Jersey” Smithson gives them the attention they deserve.